Get a Quote
Home•Hire ERP Consultant

Hire ERP Consultants in US

Consultants Who Earn No Commission on What They Recommend

Most ERP advice in US comes from firms reselling the software they recommend. We resell no ERP, so selection advice carries no licence margin. We are a software development company, which is its own bias, and we say where it applies.

Book A Free Consultation
SOC 2 CompliantISO 20000ISO 9001ISO 27001HIPAA CompliantGDPRClutch 5.0 RatingDesignRush 5 Star RatingCapterraGartnerVantaDrataOktaNinjaOneMicrosoft PartnerSophosCisco MerakiVMwareAWS PartnerGoogle WorkspaceDattoSentinelOnePalo AltoSOC 2 CompliantISO 20000ISO 9001ISO 27001HIPAA CompliantGDPRClutch 5.0 RatingDesignRush 5 Star RatingCapterraGartnerVantaDrataOktaNinjaOneMicrosoft PartnerSophosCisco MerakiVMwareAWS PartnerGoogle WorkspaceDattoSentinelOnePalo Alto

Why Choose ERP Consultants from OSDY LLC ?

No Licence Margin in Our Advice

We are not a reseller or implementation partner for any ERP vendor, so we receive nothing if you choose one product over another. That matters because the standard channel pays partners a share of licence revenue plus the implementation hours, which means the firm recommending a platform is usually the firm that profits from it being chosen. Ask any consultant you speak with whether they hold a partner agreement, and what it pays.

We Argue for Less Customisation

Almost every ERP disaster traces back to the same decision: bending the software to match how the company already works instead of the reverse. Heavy customisation makes upgrades expensive and eventually freezes you on an old version. Since we bill for development, recommending less of it costs us money in the short term and saves you a great deal over five years.

Data Migration Treated as the Real Risk

Go-live dates slip because of master data far more often than because of software. Duplicate customer records, item masters with three different units of measure for the same product, open transactions nobody can reconcile. We start data profiling in the first weeks rather than the last, because that is the work that determines whether the launch is calm or chaotic.

US Requirements Handled Properly

Multi-province sales tax, bilingual documents where requires them, CRA payroll year-end, cross-border currency and customs. These are the details that US-centric implementations miss and then patch in a hurry after the first month-end. We scope them at the start because retrofitting tax logic into a live ERP is genuinely unpleasant.

Services

Our ERP Consulting Services

ERP consultancy across the full lifecycle, from selection through implementation support, integration and the ongoing work that keeps a system fitting the business as it changes.

ERP Selection & Vendor Evaluation

  • Requirements built from your processes, not a template.
  • Scripted demos against your awkward cases.
  • Written recommendation with the runners-up explained.
Explore Selection →

Fit-Gap Analysis

  • Where standard functionality already covers you.
  • Where a genuine gap needs an extension.
  • Where the process should change instead.
Explore Fit-Gap →

ERP Implementation Support

  • Client-side project leadership and governance.
  • We hold your interests against the implementer.
  • Scope discipline so change orders stay visible.
Explore Implementation →

ERP Integration Services

  • ERP connected to eCommerce, CRM, WMS and EDI.
  • APIs and middleware rather than nightly spreadsheets.
  • One source of truth for orders and inventory.
Explore Integration →

Data Migration & Cleansing

  • Master data profiled and deduplicated early.
  • History archived rather than dragged into the new system.
  • Reconciliation you can show an auditor.
Explore Migration →

Custom Extensions & Development

  • Built on supported extension models, not core edits.
  • Upgrade-safe by design.
  • Only where configuration genuinely cannot reach.
Explore Development →

ERP Rescue & Recovery

  • Independent assessment of a stalled programme.
  • What to salvage, what to stop, what it will take.
  • Honest even when the answer is uncomfortable.
Explore Rescue →

Process Automation

  • Approvals, matching and routine posting.
  • Automate after the process is fixed, not before.
  • Measured in hours returned to the team.
Explore Automation →

Legacy ERP Modernisation

  • Options for an unsupported or heavily modified system.
  • Re-implement, upgrade or extend, costed honestly.
  • Migration path that does not stop the business.
Explore Modernisation →

ERP Deployment Services

  • Cloud, private cloud or on-premise, compared on cost.
  • Environments, releases and cutover planning.
  • Hypercare through the first month-end.
Explore Deployment →

Hire ERP Developers

  • ERP developers and technical analysts, monthly.
  • You interview them before anyone starts.
  • Platform-specific skills, not generalists.
Hire Developers →
Reviewing ERP requirements and shortlist findings with a client finance team

Get the recommendation in writing.

Book A Free Consultation ›
❝
Three partners told us their product was the answer. OSDY LLC wrote down our requirements first, then told us two of the three would work and which one would cost less to run. Nobody else was willing to say that.
CFO, Distribution Group

What to Expect From an ERP Consulting Firm

Business Priorities

Commercial position
Requirements
Demos
Customisation stance
Data migration
Total cost view
Exit

Industry Gaps

Resells the product being recommended
Vendor feature checklist
Vendor script, generic data
Bills for every modification
Late-stage task
Assumed to be configuration
Licence and implementation only
Locked to their platform and team

Our Proven Advantage

No reseller agreement, no licence margin
Built from your processes and edge cases
Your scenarios, your awkward transactions
Argues for configuration wherever it works
Profiled and cleansed from week one
Designed in before the platform is chosen
Five-year view including support and upgrades
Documentation, handover and no lock-in

Global Standards. Built-In Trust.

An ERP holds your financial records, your customer data and often your employee payroll, which puts it squarely inside audit and privacy scope. We work with segregation of duties designed into the role model rather than granted broadly and tidied later, approval limits that match your delegation of authority, audit trails that survive an external review, and single sign-on with proper offboarding. Background-checked consultants, and PIPEDA and GDPR aware handling of the data we touch during migration.

ISO 27001
ISO 9001
ISO 20000
HIPAA Compliant
GDPR
AICPA SOC

Book a Free Consultation

Pick a time that suits you. Bring the problem rather than a shortlist. Tell us what breaks at month-end, which processes run on spreadsheets outside the system, and what you have been quoted so far. We will tell you what we would do in your position. Half an hour, no charge, no obligation.

Rated Among the Best ERP Consultants in US

Finance and operations leaders work with OSDY LLC because we are willing to say which platform we would not choose and why. Review boards including Clutch, DesignRush and GoodFirms list us among the top ERP consultant and ERP consulting firms in US, and most of our work arrives by referral from a CFO or controller who valued getting a written recommendation instead of a proposal. If you are shortlisting the best ERP consulting services US offers, we would rather be judged on whether our advice survives scrutiny than on a directory badge.

Clutch DesignRush GoodFirms
Book A Free Consultation →

ERP Platforms and Technologies Our Consultants Work With

We work across the mainstream platforms rather than specialising in one, which is the point. Note that the extension languages differ entirely by platform, and that is where most hiring mistakes happen: an experienced Business Central developer is not interchangeable with an experienced NetSuite developer.

SAP S/4HANA
Oracle NetSuite
Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations
Oracle Fusion Cloud
Infor CloudSuite
Workday
Dynamics 365 Business Central
Sage Intacct & X3
Acumatica
Odoo
Epicor Kinetic
SAP Business One
AL for Business Central
X++ for Finance & Operations
ABAP & SAP BTP
SuiteScript for NetSuite
Apex for Certinia
Python for Odoo
REST & OData APIs
EDI Trading Partners
Azure Logic Apps
Apache Kafka
eCommerce & Marketplace Sync
Bank & Payment Files
Master Data Cleansing
ETL & Staging Loads
PostgreSQL & SQL Server
Power BI
Reconciliation & Validation
History Archiving
GST, HST, PST & QST
Bilingual English & French
CRA Payroll & Year-End
Multi-Currency& USD
Segregation of Duties
Single Sign-On & Audit Trails

Our ERP Consulting Process

Five stages, Diagnose, Select, Configure, Migrate and Go Live, with the selection decision documented so it survives a change of sponsor.

Diagnose

We map how the business actually runs today, which is rarely how the process documentation says it runs. That means sitting with the people doing month-end, order entry, purchasing and inventory counts, and cataloguing every spreadsheet operating outside the current system, because each one is either a genuine requirement or a habit worth ending. You finish with a prioritised requirement set separating what is mandatory from what is merely familiar, which is the single most useful artefact in an ERP project.

Select

A long list narrowed to three or four credible options, then demos scripted by us using your transactions rather than the vendor’s. We insist on seeing your genuinely awkward cases: the consignment stock, the partial shipment with a credit, the intercompany transfer, the QST calculation. Reference calls go to customers of similar size in similar industries, and we ask them what went badly. You get a written recommendation naming the runners-up and the reasons, so the decision can be defended a year later.

Configure

Standard functionality configured first, and every proposed customisation forced to justify itself against a configuration alternative. Where an extension is genuinely needed, it is built on the platform’s supported extension model rather than by modifying core objects, so upgrades stay routine. This is the stage where saying no repeatedly saves the most money, and where a consultant with no stake in the licence has the easiest time doing it.

Migrate

Data work starts far earlier than most plans assume. We profile the existing data, quantify the duplicates and the gaps, and agree what actually needs to move: master data almost always, open transactions usually, ten years of history almost never. History belongs in a read-only archive or a reporting warehouse where it stays available without polluting the new system. Then repeated trial loads with reconciliation reports, so the final cutover is a rehearsed exercise rather than a first attempt.

Go Live

Cutover planned to the hour, with a documented rollback position and training delivered close enough to go-live that people remember it. Then hypercare through the first full month-end, because that is when the real problems surface: the tax code nobody tested, the report finance needs on day three, the integration that works on ninety-eight percent of orders. We plan for that fortnight rather than treating it as an overrun.

How to Hire an ERP Technical Developer or Analyst

Two questions reach us almost verbatim: how to hire ERP technical developer candidates, and how to hire ERP technical analyst candidates. They usually come from a CFO or IT manager who has to assess people in a field they do not work in themselves. The first thing worth knowing is that ERP skills are far less transferable than the job titles suggest. Platform experience is what matters, and the extension technologies have almost nothing in common with each other.

The second is that there are two genuinely different roles frequently advertised as one. A technical analyst translates business requirements into system design, configures the application and knows what the platform can do without code. A technical developer writes extensions, integrations and reports in the platform’s language. Hiring one when you needed the other is the most common and most expensive mistake in ERP staffing.

Below are the questions we would use, the rates we would expect to pay in US, and the tests that separate people who have run a go-live from people who have read about one. Use them with us or with anybody else.

Four questions do most of the work. Ask what they would migrate and what they would deliberately leave behind, because anyone who has been through a go-live answers immediately that history stays in an archive and only master data plus open transactions move; a candidate who says they would bring everything across has not done it. Ask them to describe a customisation they argued against and what they proposed instead, which tests whether they have ever pushed back on a client. Ask what happened at the first month-end after a system they worked on went live, since real answers involve specific chaos and invented ones are smooth. Finally ask which platform they would not recommend for your situation and why, because a candidate with no negative opinions has either not seen enough or is selling.
Worth being precise, because the market blurs these deliberately. A technical analyst owns the fit-gap work, configures the application, designs the role and permission model, writes functional specifications and usually handles data mapping. Strong ones prevent development from being needed at all. A technical developer builds what configuration cannot: extensions, integrations, complex reports and data conversion tooling. On most projects you need roughly two analysts for every developer, and if you have hired the reverse you will end up with a heavily customised system that could have been configured. When a job description asks for one person who does both at a senior level, expect either a very expensive hire or a mediocre one.
Independent senior ERP consultants in US generally bill between one hundred and fifty and three hundred and fifty dollars an hour depending on platform and scarcity, with SAP and Oracle Fusion at the upper end and mid-market platforms lower. Large consultancies and the major accounting firms run considerably higher, often double, and bring process depth and a large bench you may or may not need. Offshore rates run a third to a half of US rates and work well for development and report writing, less well for the workshop and change-management side where being in the room matters. For a mid-market implementation, budget consulting and implementation services at one to two times the annual software subscription in the first year.
Nearly every ERP horror story shares one ancestor: the decision to make the software match existing processes rather than adapting processes to the software. It feels like the safe, low-disruption choice and it is the opposite. Every modification has to be retested at each upgrade, and once there are enough of them the organisation stops upgrading, which means falling behind on security patches and eventually running an unsupported version that nobody remembers how to change. The vendors have responded by restricting how deeply you can modify their cloud products, and although that frustrates people during implementation, it is protecting them. Our working rule is that a customisation needs a genuine competitive or regulatory reason, not merely that the old system did it that way. Preference is not a requirement, and telling those apart is most of the value in a fit-gap exercise.
When a go-live slips, the reason is usually data rather than software. Nobody discovers until week twenty that the customer master holds four spellings of the same company, that the item master uses cases and eaches inconsistently, that there are open purchase orders from six years ago nobody will close, or that historic transactions reference cost centres that no longer exist. This work cannot be compressed because it needs decisions from people who know the business, and those people have day jobs. So we start data profiling in the first weeks, put numbers on the problem early, and treat cleansing as a parallel workstream with its own owner. It is unglamorous, and it does more to protect the go-live date than anything else available to you.
A real strategic decision rather than a technical one. A single suite gives you one vendor, one data model and integration you do not have to build, at the cost of accepting that some modules will be mediocre. Best-of-breed gives you a strong warehouse system or a strong CRM, and hands you the integration and reconciliation work permanently. Our rough guidance is to keep finance, purchasing and inventory in the suite because that is where a shared data model earns its keep, and to consider specialist products where a module would be genuinely weak against a demanding operational need, such as complex warehousing, manufacturing execution or field service. Two-tier arrangements, with a heavier ERP at the parent and something lighter at subsidiaries, are also legitimate and often cheaper than forcing a small division onto a corporate platform.
We are called into troubled implementations often, and the pattern is consistent: scope grew without the budget following, the customisation list is long, the data is not ready, and nobody wants to be the person who says the date will not hold. The first useful thing an outsider does is establish the actual position rather than the reported one, which typically takes two to three weeks of examining the configuration, the customisation register, the data readiness and the test evidence. The recommendation that follows is usually to descope hard and go live with less, occasionally to change implementation partner while keeping the platform, and sometimes to stop and reselect. That last conclusion is unwelcome and we will still deliver it, in writing, with the reasoning laid out so you can weigh it yourself.
The mistake here is treating go-live as the end. An ERP needs an owner, a small ongoing budget and a queue, because the business will keep changing and the system has to keep up. Realistically that means someone internal who owns the roadmap, a standing arrangement for platform release management as your vendor ships updates several times a year, and a modest allowance for the reports and small enhancements that get requested once people start using the system properly. Organisations that budget nothing for year two end up back on spreadsheets within eighteen months, having concluded the ERP does not do what they need, when in fact nobody was funded to finish the job.

Proven by Results

Advice with no licence margin attached.

Book A Free Consultation →
0

ERP reseller agreements held, by design

0

weeks to a written selection recommendation

0

client reviews across our US work

0.8

average client rating

Projects We Have Delivered

Skills Compétences US digital platform

Empowering Future Talent in Trades and Technology

Commissioned by Skills US, we built a national bilingual platform with native apps, a secure CMS, and cloud infrastructure to promote trades and technology careers at scale.
Wildlife Health Cooperative surveillance platform

Digitizing Wildlife Surveillance for National Resilience

For the Wildlife Health Cooperative, we replaced siloed tools with a cloud-native platform that unifies field reports, lab diagnostics, and cross-province analytics in real time.
Seattle Aquarium interactive digital experience

Interactive Learning Through Digital Experience

We unified kiosks, ticketing, and mobile into one cloud-native platform for Seattle Aquarium, raising visitor engagement and streamlining operations across every touchpoint.

ERP Consulting by Industry

The requirement that decides the platform is almost always industry-specific. These are the ones that shape a shortlist.

Manufacturing

Manufacturing

  • Bills of material and routings.
  • Shop floor and capacity planning.
  • Standard versus actual costing.

Wholesale & Distribution

Wholesale & Distribution

  • Multi-warehouse allocation.
  • Landed cost and duty.
  • EDI with major retailers.

Food & Beverage

Food & Beverage

  • Lot traceability and recall.
  • Catch weight and shelf life.
  • Quality and audit records.

Retail & eCommerce

Retail & eCommerce

  • Omnichannel order flow.
  • Inventory synced across channels.
  • Returns and settlement.

Construction & Projects

Construction & Projects

  • Job costing and WIP.
  • Progress billing and holdbacks.
  • Subcontractor management.
Legal Services Industry

Professional Services

Professional Services

  • Time, expense and utilisation.
  • Project revenue recognition.
  • Multi-entity billing.

Healthcare & Life Sciences

Healthcare & Life Sciences

  • Validated processes and audit trails.
  • Lot and expiry control.
  • Regulated document handling.

Pharmaceuticals

Pharmaceuticals

  • Batch records and deviations.
  • Serialisation and labelling.
  • Controlled substance tracking.

Logistics & Transport

Logistics & Transport

  • Freight cost allocation.
  • Fleet and maintenance costs.
  • Customer billing accuracy.

Energy & Resources

Energy & Resources

  • Field ticketing and capital projects.
  • Joint venture accounting.
  • Regulatory reporting.

Financial Services

Financial Services

  • Multi-entity consolidation.
  • Regulatory and audit reporting.
  • Revenue recognition rules.

Public Sector & Nonprofit

Public Sector & Nonprofit

  • Fund and grant accounting.
  • Procurement controls.
  • Bilingual reporting.

Hire ERP Consultants Who Will Tell You What Not to Buy

The best ERP consultant for your situation is the one willing to reduce the size of the project. Software vendors are paid on licences, implementation partners on hours, and both are perfectly capable of doing good work while still having a structural interest in you buying more. Knowing where each party’s money comes from, ours included, is the most practical form of due diligence available to you.

As an ERP consultancy we cover selection and vendor evaluation, fit-gap analysis, implementation governance on your side of the table, integration, data migration, upgrade-safe extensions, reporting and post-go-live support. Fixed fees for advisory work, written recommendations you can defend internally, and ERP developers and technical analysts available if you would rather build the capability in your own team. As an ERP application development company we also build the portals, extensions and integrations that sit around the platform, which is where a straight ERP development company and a straight advisory firm each tend to leave a gap.

Explore IT consulting services, system integration, custom software development, process automation, legacy modernisation, digital transformation consulting or IT staff augmentation for embedded specialists.

Book A Free Consultation →
ERP consultants reviewing a selection recommendation with a client

Frequently Asked Questions

Independent senior ERP consultants in US generally bill one hundred and fifty to three hundred and fifty dollars an hour, with SAP and Oracle Fusion specialists at the upper end and mid-market platform consultants lower. Large consultancies and the major accounting firms often charge roughly double that. Offshore rates run a third to a half of US rates and suit development and report writing better than workshops. For a monthly engagement with us, a dedicated ERP consultant is priced as a flat monthly rate rather than hourly, which is usually cheaper if the work is continuous.
Mainly because we hold no ERP reseller agreements, so we earn nothing from which platform you choose and can recommend against one without cost to ourselves. We are also candid about our own bias, which is that we make money building software, so we invite you to challenge us whenever we propose development over configuration. Beyond that: you interview the consultants yourself, pricing is fixed per milestone for project work, and the documentation and decisions stay yours.
Yes, always and directly. You interview them before anyone is assigned, you have their contact details, and they attend your workshops and stand-ups. We do not operate the model where a senior person wins the work and hands it to whoever is free, and we would encourage you to ask that question of every firm you shortlist, because in this industry it is a real and common practice.
For a mid-market implementation, a typical shape is one project lead, two functional or technical analysts and one developer, with finance and operations people from your own side committing meaningful time. The ratio that matters is roughly two analysts per developer, because most requirements should be met by configuration rather than code. If a proposal has more developers than analysts, ask why, since it usually signals a heavily customised design.
Three. A fixed-fee advisory engagement, most often for selection or a fit-gap assessment, with a defined deliverable and end date. A dedicated monthly team, where consultants work as part of your organisation and you can scale up or down with a month’s notice. Or a fixed-price project for a defined piece of work such as an integration or a data migration. Many clients start with the fixed-fee selection and then decide.
Tell us early and we replace the person, at our cost, with a handover period so you do not lose context. For monthly engagements the notice period is a month, so you are never locked into a long commitment with someone who is not working out. For fixed-price work, the milestone structure means you are approving deliverables as they arrive rather than at the end.
Yes. We staff to your working hours rather than asking you to take calls at inconvenient times, which matters more on ERP than on most projects because the work is workshop-heavy and needs your finance and operations people present. We cover Eastern through Pacific hours for US clients, and for clients in British Columbia we specifically assign consultants working Pacific time.
Access is least-privilege and time-bound, so consultants get only the systems they need and access is revoked when the engagement ends. Production data is not copied to local machines; migration work happens in controlled environments with masked or subset data wherever the task allows. Consultants are background-checked and under NDA, access is logged, and we work within your identity provider and single sign-on rather than creating shadow accounts.
Written, estimated and approved before work starts, and kept in a visible register with a running total. This matters more on ERP than elsewhere because scope creep in these projects is rarely one big decision; it is thirty small ones that nobody added up. We review the register with you at every steering meeting so the cumulative cost stays in front of the people accountable for the budget.
Yes, month to month. Post-go-live an ERP still needs an owner, and cloud platforms now ship updates several times a year that need release management and regression testing. Support covers that, plus the reports and small enhancements people request once they are genuinely using the system. Organisations that budget nothing for year two tend to drift back to spreadsheets, so we would rather you plan a modest ongoing allowance than discover the need later.
The practical difference shows up in three places. Requirements are written from your processes before any product is discussed, rather than being shaped by one platform’s feature list. Demos are scripted with your own awkward transactions instead of the vendor’s tidy demo data. And the recommendation is written down with the runners-up and the reasoning, so it can be defended when the sponsor changes. An independent ERP consultant should also be willing to be paid for the selection and then have no involvement in the build, and it is fair to ask that outright. Genuinely independent ERP consultants are a smaller group than the search results suggest, because most firms describing themselves that way still hold a partner certification somewhere.
Worth untangling, because the words are used loosely and they describe different commercial positions. ERP partners are certified resellers of a specific product who earn a margin on licences and then bill the project; they are often excellent ERP implementers with deep product knowledge, and their advice on which product to buy is not neutral. ERP consultant firms in the advisory sense sell only their time, so they can compare products, though many quietly hold partner status too. Systems integrators focus on connecting the ERP to everything else. When you are evaluating ERP consulting firms in US, the single most useful question is which of these three a firm actually is, because the label on the website rarely tells you.
Realistically all three, and it is fair to want that separated out. As an ERP services provider we deliver integration, data migration, extensions, reporting and ERP deployment services. As an ERP consultancy we do selection, fit-gap and client-side governance, sold as advisory days with no product margin attached. And as a software firm we provide ERP software development services for the applications that surround the platform. We keep the advisory work billable separately from the build precisely so that the recommendation cannot be accused of steering work toward ourselves, and you are welcome to buy only the first part.
Ask for specifics rather than certifications, because certifications prove someone passed an exam. A credible ERP software expert can describe a go-live they were present for, including what broke at the first month-end, and can tell you which platform they would not recommend for your situation and why. Real ERP experts also have opinions about data migration scope and will volunteer that history belongs in an archive. When we put forward an enterprise resource planning consultant for your project you interview them directly and can apply exactly this test, and if you would rather hire ERP expert capability into your own team permanently we are happy to help you assess candidates rather than supply them.
Yes, and it is the engagement we would recommend starting with. As an ERP selection consultant we are paid for the analysis rather than the outcome, which is the whole point: an ERP software selection consultant who also wants the implementation has an interest in the answer. The deliverable is a requirement set, a scored shortlist, findings from demos scripted with your data, reference call notes and a written recommendation with the runners-up explained. Four to eight weeks, fixed price, and you are free to hand it to any implementer you choose.
Sometimes, and we will be direct about the conditions. We do subcontract work for consultancies and managed service providers, typically on integration, data migration and custom extension development where a firm has the functional depth but not the engineering bench. What we will not do is present a recommendation as independent when it is being routed through a party earning licence margin, because that is the exact problem this page is about. If the arrangement is transparent to the end client, we are open to it.
The first conversation is free and deliberately unstructured, because most people arrive with a symptom rather than a specification. Beyond that, a paid ERP consultation typically means a short diagnostic: two or three weeks reviewing your current processes, systems and data, ending in a written view of whether you need a new ERP at all, what it would involve, and a cost range. A surprising number of those diagnostics conclude that consulting ERP software vendors is premature and that fixing a process or integrating two existing systems would solve the actual problem for a fraction of the money.
No. We hold no reseller, VAR or implementation partner agreement with any ERP vendor, and we receive no commission or licence margin from your choice. Our income from ERP work is advisory days, integration and custom development. That last item is a bias, and we would rather name it than pretend to perfect neutrality: we benefit when a project involves building software, so challenge us when we suggest development instead of configuration.
Yes, and a good number of clients do exactly that. A fixed-fee selection engagement typically runs four to eight weeks and delivers a requirement set, a scored shortlist, scripted demo findings, reference call notes and a written recommendation. After that you are free to appoint whichever implementation partner you like. We are happy to review their statement of work before you sign, or to disappear entirely.
Requirements first, gathered from the people doing the work rather than from a feature checklist, and separated into mandatory and merely familiar. Then a long list narrowed to three or four credible options on the basis of industry fit, size fit and US capability. Then demos scripted by us with your transactions, including the cases that break things. Then reference calls to comparable customers where we ask specifically what went badly. Then a five-year total cost comparison covering subscription, implementation, integration, training and ongoing support, not just the licence quote.
A structured comparison of what you need against what a platform does as standard. Each requirement lands in one of three buckets: met by standard functionality, met by configuration, or a genuine gap. Gaps then get a decision, which is either to build an extension, buy a third-party add-on, or change the process. The value is mostly in the discipline of separating a real requirement from a preference inherited from the old system, and it is the artefact that keeps a project from quietly growing.
As little as you possibly can. This is the decision behind nearly every ERP failure. Modifications have to be retested at every upgrade, and once enough accumulate the organisation stops upgrading, which eventually means running an unsupported version nobody understands. Vendors have deliberately restricted deep modification in their cloud products for this reason. Our rule is that a customisation needs a competitive or regulatory justification, not just that the previous system worked that way.
For a mid-market single-entity implementation, six to twelve months from selection to go-live is realistic. Multi-entity, multi-country or manufacturing-heavy programmes run twelve to twenty-four months. The variables that actually move the date are data readiness, how quickly your own people can make decisions, and how disciplined you are about scope. Software configuration is rarely the bottleneck, which surprises people.
Four things, in rough order of frequency. Data turns out to be far worse than anyone admitted, and cleansing cannot be compressed because it needs business decisions. Scope grows through many small approvals that nobody totals. Customisation is used to avoid changing processes, storing up upgrade pain. And training plus change management get cut when the budget tightens, which is precisely how a technically successful implementation still fails, because people work around a system they do not understand.
Frequently, and it is a common reason people call us. We spend two to three weeks establishing the real position rather than the reported one, looking at configuration, the customisation register, data readiness and test evidence. The recommendation is usually to descope hard and go live with less, sometimes to change implementation partner while keeping the platform, and occasionally to stop and reselect. We will deliver that last conclusion in writing with the reasoning if that is what the evidence shows.
The mainstream ones, deliberately rather than specialising in one. Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central and Finance and Operations, Oracle NetSuite, SAP S/4HANA and Business One, Sage Intacct and X3, Acumatica, Odoo, Epicor Kinetic, Infor and Certinia. Working across several is what lets us compare them honestly, and it is also why we are careful to staff platform-specific skills rather than claiming a generalist can pick any of them up quickly.
Yes, and the first thing to establish is which Dynamics you mean, because the two are quite different products with different skills. Business Central is the mid-market product, extended with the AL language. Finance and Operations is the enterprise product, extended with X++. Someone strong in one is not automatically useful in the other, and job adverts frequently blur them. Tell us the product and the module and we will put forward people with genuinely relevant experience.
Yes, with one important note: FinancialForce was renamed Certinia in 2023, so both names refer to the same product. It is worth knowing that it is built natively on the Salesforce platform, which means anyone looking to hire FinancialForce ERP developer talent is really looking for a Salesforce platform developer working in Apex, Lightning components and SOQL, with accounting domain knowledge layered on. If you need to hire FinancialForce ERP admin support, the relevant skills are Salesforce administration plus the Certinia accounting modules, which is a different person again. That distinction matters a great deal when you are reading résumés, because the job titles do not reveal it.
Yes, and hiring a web development agency for Epicor is more common than you might think, because the core ERP is usually already in place and the gap is a customer portal, a dealer site or a shop floor application on top of Epicor Kinetic. The catch is that the difficulty is not the front end at all. It is understanding the Epicor data model, working through its REST APIs and business activity queries, and not breaking upgrade compatibility. A capable web agency with no Epicor context will reach straight into the database, which works immediately and causes real trouble at the next upgrade. We integrate through the supported interfaces instead.
Yes to both, most often on the integration, data migration, reporting and custom extension side rather than as the primary implementer. On SAP that means respecting the clean core principle and building extensions outside the core rather than modifying it. On NetSuite it means SuiteScript and SuiteFlow customisation done in a way that survives the twice-yearly releases. If you need a full primary implementation, we will often recommend a strong partner for that and stay on your side of the table reviewing their work.
Yes, and ERP consulting services for small businesses US wide is a real part of what we do, with an honest caveat about where the floor sits. Below roughly fifteen or twenty staff a full ERP is often the wrong purchase, and accounting software plus a good inventory or job management tool will serve you better for a fraction of the cost and disruption. Where a smaller business genuinely does need ERP is when inventory, manufacturing or multi-entity accounting has outgrown those tools. We will say plainly which side of that line you are on, even though the smaller answer is worth less to us.
We are not going to claim the title, partly because it depends entirely on your platform, industry and size, and partly because every firm on that search results page claims it. What we would offer instead is the test. A top ERP consultant US businesses should trust will write requirements before mentioning a product, will disclose any partner agreement unprompted, will script demos with your data, will name the runners-up in writing, and will accept a fixed fee for selection and then walk away. Ask five firms those five questions. The list of genuine ERP implementation consultants shortens quickly, and the answer you get will be more useful than any ranking, including ours.
Probably, and it is worth being clear about what proximity buys you on this kind of project. ERP work is inherently distributed now, since the system is in the cloud, the workshops run on video and the documentation is shared. What genuinely benefits from being in a room is discovery, demo day and go-live week. So rather than filtering for ERP consultants near me, we would suggest filtering for platform experience, industry fit and willingness to put a recommendation in writing, then checking they will travel for the three moments that matter.
Over five years, not on the licence quote, because the subscription is frequently the smaller number. Include implementation services, integration development, data migration, training, any third-party add-ons, internal staff time which is real even though it is not invoiced, annual subscription increases which are often contractual, and an allowance for year-two enhancements. Two platforms with similar subscription costs can differ substantially once implementation effort and integration needs are included, and that is usually the deciding factor rather than features.
Depends on where your operational complexity sits. A single suite gives one vendor, one data model and integration you do not have to build, accepting that some modules will be mediocre. Best-of-breed gives you a strong specialist system and permanent integration work. Our general guidance is to keep finance, purchasing and inventory in the suite, and to consider specialists where a module would be genuinely weak against a demanding need such as complex warehousing, manufacturing execution or field service.
Two-tier means running a heavier ERP at the parent company and a lighter one at subsidiaries or divisions, with consolidation between them. It is a legitimate strategy and often cheaper and faster than forcing a small division onto a corporate platform it does not need. The trade-off is a consolidation and intercompany process to maintain, plus two skill sets. It works well when divisions are operationally distinct, and badly when they share customers, inventory and processes closely.
Yes, and this question reaches this page more often than you would expect, for a fairly sensible reason: ERP portals, dashboards, dealer sites and customer-facing extensions are almost always built as web applications in exactly these frameworks, so an ERP programme frequently needs front-end specialists alongside the platform people. If your requirement is purely front-end rather than ERP, we staff that too. People arrive here looking to hire Vue.js developers or hire Vue js developers for a portal, to hire dedicated Angular developers for an internal operations tool, to hire Meteor consultant support for an older application still running on that stack, or to hire Preact developer time where bundle size matters. Our Angular, React and full-stack hiring pages cover that side properly, and one straight warning on Meteor specifically: it is a niche stack now, the talent pool is thin, and if you are choosing it for something new rather than maintaining something old, we would ask you to reconsider first.
Yes, before any detailed discussion if you prefer. Send yours or use ours. Financial processes, margins and system weaknesses are sensitive, and nobody should have to describe them on trust.
Book a free consultation. Half an hour, no charge, no obligation. Bring the problem rather than a shortlist: what breaks at month-end, which processes run on spreadsheets outside the system, and what you have been quoted so far. We will tell you what we would do in your position, including if that means not buying an ERP this year.

Build. Launch. Grow.

Hire ERP consultants who earn nothing from the platform you pick. Book a free consultation and bring the month-end that keeps going wrong.

Book A Free Consultation →
ERP consultants reviewing a multi-entity implementation plan